The Commission on Capital Cases was not funded in the FY 2011-2012 General Appropriations Act, and the Commission ceased operations on June 30, 2011. This site and the Commission website are being retained to provide access to historical materials.

The Registry Attorneys will be continued by the Justice Administration Commission.

These actions are effective July 1, 2011.
 

Disclaimer: The Commission on Capital Cases receives this information from a variety of sources. The site will be updated consistently as information is received and will be audited bi-annually. We make every attempt to ensure the accuracy of the information provided; however, the information should be verified by the applicable court prior to using it for legal or statistical purposes.


Inmate

Last NameFirst NamePictureDC NumberAgencyCase Summary
SpencerDusty 321031CCRC-MCase Summary

Last Action

DateCourtCase NumberLast Action
12/13/2006USCA06-16503Habeas Appeal filed
6/22/2010USCA06-16503USCA affirmed the denial of the Habeas Petition
12/8/2008FSC08-22703.851 appeal filed
3/23/2009FSC08-2270Initial brief filed
5/4/2009FSC08-2270Answer brief filed
11/18/2009FSC08-2270FSC affirmed denial of 3.851 Motion
9/18/2010USSC10-7637Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed
12/22/2010USSC10-7637Response filed
1/24/2011USSC10-7637Petition denied
10/29/2007CC92-4733.851 motion filed
11/15/2007CC92-473State's response filed
2/5/2008CC92-4733.851 denied
2/20/2008CC92-473Motion for Rehearing filed
5/20/2008CC92-473Motion for leave to file amended motion filed
10/3/2008CC92-473Successive motion denied
10/27/2008CC92-473Motion for Rehearing filed
11/4/2008CC92-473Motion for Rehearing dismissed

Current Attorney


Cases


Last Updated

2008-01-09 11:43:13.0


Case Summary
Direct Links

The Commission on Capital Cases updates this information regularly

The Commission on Capital Cases updates thisinformation regularly.  This information, however, is subject to changeand may not reflect the latest status of an inmate’s case and should not berelied upon for statistical or legal purposes.

 

SPENCER, Dusty (W/M)

DC #    321031

DOB:   02/13/52

 

­­­Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County, Case#92-0473

Sentencing Judge: The Honorable Belvin Perry

Resentencing Judge: The Honorable Belvin Perry

Attorney, Trial: Donald T. Smallwood and Richard Nick Kelley– Private

Attorney, Direct Appeal (1st and 2nd):James R. Wulchak – Assistant Public Defender

Attorneys, Collateral Appeals:  Maria Chamberlin –CCRC-M

 

Date of Offense: 01/18/92

Date of Sentence: 12/21/92

Date of Resentence: 01/18/95

 

Circumstances of Offense:

 

Dusty Spencer was convicted and sentenced to death for themurder of his wife, Karen Spencer.

 

Karen Spencer asked her husband, Dusty Spencer, to move outof their home early in December 1991.  On 12/10/91, Dusty Spencerquestioned Karen about money that she had withdrawn from the banking accountfor their painting business.  This argument led to a physical altercationin which Dusty choked, hit, and threatened to kill Karen.  Karen calledthe police, and the police subsequently arrested Dusty.  Dusty latercalled and threatened Karen from jail.

 

Karen Spencer requested that Dusty Spencer spend theholidays at their home, but asked him to leave after Christmas.  On NewYear’s Day, Dusty told friends that he had considered throwing Karen off of hisboat, in order to drown her.

 

On 01/04/92, Dusty Spencer again went to Karen’s home, andthey fought.  During the fight, Timothy Johnson, Karen’s son awoke, andwent into his mother’s bedroom where Dusty and Karen Spencer werefighting.  According to Johnson, Dusty was on top of Karen and was hittingher with a clothes iron.  When Johnson intervened, Dusty hit him with theclothes iron as Johnson retreated to his bedroom.  Karen fled the home tofind help.  Johnson tried to call for help, but Dusty Spencer pulled thephone out of the wall.  Dusty then fled the house and left town. Karen Spencer and Timothy Johnson were taken to the hospital, and a physicianconfirmed that Karen’s wounds were consistent with being struck by a clothesiron.

 

On 11/18/92, Timothy Johnson heard fighting in thebackyard.  He retrieved a firearm from his mother’s bedroom and wentoutside.  Once outside, Johnson saw Dusty Spencer hitting his mother witha brick.  He also observed blood on Karen Spencer’s face.  Johnsonreported that he tried to shoot Dusty Spencer, but the firearm misfired. Thus, he hit Spencer in the head with the butt of the firearm.  Dusty thenpulled up Karen’s nightgown and made lewd comments and slammed Karen’s headagainst a concrete wall.  Karen was begging Dusty to stop, and Johnsontried to help his mother get away from Dusty.  Dusty threatened Johnson witha knife; therefore, Johnson ran to a neighbor’s home to find help.

 

The police were called, and upon arrival, they found thedead body of Karen Spencer.  The police determined that she had beenstabbed four or five times in the chest.  She also had suffered bluntforce trauma to the head and defensive cuts to the hands and arms.

 

Trial Summary:

 

02/06/92          Spencerwas indicted on the following counts:

                                    CountI:           First-Degree Murder

                                    CountII:         Aggravated Assault without a Weapon

                                    CountIII:        Attempted First-Degree Murder

                                    CountIV:        Aggravated Battery

11/07/92          Spencer was found guilty on CountsI, II, and IV charged the indictment.  Spencer was found guilty of thelesser charge of Attempted Second-Degree Murder for Count III.

12/09/92          Upon advisory sentencing, thejury, by a 7 to 5 majority, voted for the death penalty.

12/21/92          Spencerwas sentenced as follows:

                                    Count I:           First-Degree Murder – Death

                                    Count II:         Aggravated Assault without aWeapon – 5 years, less 338 days fortime served

                                    Count III:        Attempted First-Degree Murder– 15 years, less 338 days for time served

                                    Count IV:        Aggravated Battery – 15 years, less 338 days for time served

09/22/94          FSC affirmed the convictions butreversed the sentence of death and remanded for reconsideration by the trialjudge.

01/18/95          Spencerwas resentenced as follows:

                                    CountI:           First-Degree MurderDeath

 

Appeal Summary:

 

Florida Supreme Court – Direct Appeal

FSC #80,987

645 So. 2d 377

 

12/12/92          Appealfiled.

09/22/94          FSC affirmed the convictions butreversed the sentence of death and remanded for reconsideration by the trialjudge.

12/06/94          Rehearingdenied.

01/05/95          Mandateissued.

 

Florida Supreme Court – Direct Appeal (Resentencing)

FSC #85,119

691 So. 2d 1062

 

02/07/95          Appealfiled.

09/12/96          FSCaffirmed the sentence.

04/14/97          Rehearingdenied.

05/14/97          Mandateissued.

 

U.S. Supreme Court – Petition for Writ of Certiorari

USSC #97-5249

522 U.S. 884

 

07/14/97          Petitionfiled.

10/06/97          USSCdenied the Petition.

 

Circuit Court – 3.850 Motion

CC #92-473

 

07/16/98          Motionfiled.

04/24/00          Motiondenied.

 

Florida Supreme Court – 3.850 Appeal

FSC #00-1051

842 So.2d 52

 

05/15/00          Appealfiled.

04/11/02          FSCaffirmed the 3.850 Denial.

01/09/03          FSC withdrew the 04/11/02 opinionand substituted the opinion with a revised opinion.  FSC affirmed the3.850 Denial.

01/09/03          Rehearing denied.

03/25/03          Rehearing denied.

04/24/03          Mandate issued.

Florida Supreme Court – Petition for Writ of HabeasCorpus

FSC #00-2588

842 So.2d 52

 

12/18/00          Petitionfiled.

04/11/02          Petitiondenied.

01/09/03          FSC withdrew the 04/11/02 opinionand substituted the opinion with a revised opinion.  FSC denied thepetition.

01/09/03          Rehearing denied.

03/25/03          Rehearing denied.

04/24/03          Mandate issued.

 

U.S.District Court, Middle District – Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

USDC #03-CIV-991

 

07/17/03          Petition filed.

10/14/03          Amended petition filed.

09/07/06          USDC denied petition.

12/13/06          Motion for Certificate ofAppealability filed.

01/12/07          Certificate of Appealabilitydenied.

09/08/09          Renewed Certificate ofAppealability granted in part and denied in part

 

U.S. Courtof Appeals, 11th Circuit – Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Appeal

USCA #06-16503

609 F.3d 1170

 

12/13/06          Appeal filed.

06/22/10          USCA affirmed denial of Petition

 

CircuitCourt – 3.851 Motion

CC #92-473

 

10/29/07          Motion filed.

02/05/08          Motion denied.

02/20/08          Motion for Rehearing filed.

05/20/08          Motion for Amended Motion filed.

10/03/08          Successive Motion denied.

10/27/08          Motion for Rehearing filed.

11/04/08          Motion for Rehearing dismissed.

 

Florida Supreme Court – 3.851 Appeal

FSC# 08-2270

23So.3d 712

 

12/08/08          Appealfiled.

11/18/09          FSCaffirmed denial of 3.851 Motion.

 

United States Supreme Court – Petition for Writ ofCertiorari

USSC# 10-7637

131S.Ct. 1049

 

09/18/10          Petition filed.

01/24/11          Petition denied.

 

 

Factors Contributing to the Delay in Imposition ofSentence:

 

The original sentence ofdeath was overturned and the case was remanded to the trial court for reconsiderationby the judge.  Spencer was again sentenced to death on 01/18/95.

 

Case Information:

 

Spencer filed his DirectAppeal in the Florida Supreme Court on 12/21/92.  Addressed issuesincluded that the trial court erred in denying Spencer’s motion for a dismissalbased on insufficient evidence, motion to sever charges and this motion for amistrial because of improper comments made by the prosecutor.  Finally,Spencer argued that the trial court mishandled aggravating and mitigatingfactors.  The Florida Supreme Court did not find errors that warrantedreversing the conviction.  The Florida Supreme Court, however, determinedthat the trial court mishandled evaluating aggravating and mitigatingcircumstances and doubted that the trial court could have determined if theaggravating factors outweighed the mitigating factors.  The FloridaSupreme Court affirmed the convictions, but vacated the death sentence andremanded the case for reconsideration by the trial court judge on09/22/94.  Rehearing was denied on 12/06/94.  A mandate was issued on01/05/95.

 

On remand from theFlorida Supreme Court, the judge heard arguments from the defense andprosecution.  Spencer was resentenced to death on 01/18/95.

 

Spencer filed his second DirectAppeal in the Florida Supreme Court on 02/07/95.  Addressed issuesincluded that the trial court erred in improperly imposing the sentence ofdeath because of a lack of evidence.  Spencer also argued that the trialcourt mishandled mitigating and aggravating factors.  The Florida SupremeCourt did not find errors that warranted reversing the conviction or sentenceand affirmed the conviction and sentence on 09/12/96.  Rehearing wasdenied on 04/14/97.  A Mandate was issued on 05/14/97.

 

On 07/14/97, Spencerfiled a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the United States SupremeCourt.  The petition was denied on 10/06/97.

 

Spencer filed a 3.850Motion in the circuit court on 07/16/98.  The motion was denied on04/24/00.

 

On 05/15/00, Spencerfiled a 3.850 Appeal in the Florida Supreme Court.  Spencer argued thatthere was prosecutorial misconduct, that trial counsel was ineffective and thatthere was a Brady Error[a].  The Florida Supreme Court didnot find errors that warranted reversing the 3.850 Denial and affirmed the3.850 Denial on 04/11/02.  On 01/09/03, the Florida Supreme Court withdrewthe 04/11/02 opinion and substituted the opinion with a revised opinion. The Florida Supreme Court did not find errors that warranted reversing the3.850 Denial and affirmed the 3.850 Denial.  Rehearing denied 01/09/03.Rehearing denied 03/25/03.  Mandate issued 04/24/03.

 

On 12/18/00, Spencerfiled a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in the Florida Supreme Court. Spencer argued that the death penalty was unconstitutional and that appellatecounsel was ineffective.  The Florida Supreme Court did not find errorsthat warranted granting the petition and denied the petition on 04/11/02. On 01/09/03, the Florida Supreme Court withdrew the 04/11/02 opinion andsubstituted the opinion with a revised opinion.  The Florida Supreme Courtdid not find errors that warranted granting the petition and denied thepetition.  Rehearing was denied on 01/09/03.  Rehearing denied 03/25/03. Mandate issued 04/24/03.

 

Spencer filed a Petitionfor Writ of Habeas Corpus on 07/17/03 and an amended petition on 10/14/03 inthe United States District Court, Middle District.  On 09/07/06, the USDCdenied the petition.  On 12/13/06, Spencer filed a Motion for Certificate ofAppealability which was denied on 01/12/07. On 09/08/09, a renewed Certificateof Appealability was granted in part and denied in part.

 

Spencer filed a Petitionfor Writ of Habeas Corpus Appeal on 12/13/06 in the United States Court of Appeals,11th Circuit. On 06/22/10, the USCA affirmed the denial of theHabeas Petition.

 

On 10/29/07, Spencerfiled a 3.851 motion in the Circuit Court.  This motion was denied on02/05/08.  On 02/20/08, Spencer filed a Motion for Rehearing.  On05/20/08, Spencer filed a Motion for Leave to Amend.  This motion was denied on10/03/08.  On 10/27/08, Spencer filed another Motion for Rehearing which wasdenied on 11/04/08.

 

On 12/08/08, Spencerfiled a 3.851 appeal in the Florida Supreme Court.  The Florida Supreme Courtaffirmed the decision of the lower court on 11/18/09.

 

Spencer filed a Petitionfor Writ of Certiorari in the United States Supreme Court on 09/18/10. Thispetition was denied on 01/24/11.

 

Institutional Adjustment:

 

DATE

DAYS

VIOLATION

LOCATION

09/16/93

0

POSS OF CONTRABAND

UNION CI

06/04/97

0

FIGHTING

UNION CI

 

 

 

Report Date:   04/01/02          SQ

Approved:       04/15/02          WS

Updated:         04/12/11          EMJ



[a] Brady error: An error that occurswhen the prosecution withholds information favorable to the defendant’s case.